The Arab spring is an example of
how the pressed will innovate to ensure the needed change to regain their lost
rights. This movement was a chain reaction that began in a small town were the
corruption was to great which caused many more to rebel. This event can be
explained by the conflict theory because the social difference over came many
difficulties and even resembles the reasons for many other revolutions. The
success of the movement can be seen as part of the relative deprivation theory
but in reality it matches more with the resource mobilization theory because of
how it was successful and the union of the different classes that felt the
operation and used their resources to ensure the movements efficiently
The Arab
spring was the result of a wide spread event in which a young seller burned
himself because he could no longer withstand the corruption of the police.
Based on the fact that the event was not reported many manifested with the
discontent of not knowing why did they allow something so horrible to happen
and in the end the authorities made a violent assault that was filled allowing
many to see the corruption. The events inspired those with a higher social level
to help them this lead to useful resources like intelligent people who had
ideas of how to make the movement successful. The triumph of the movement lead to
a similar revolution to happen in Egypt the largest difference was that not all
had the access to the internet and cell phones. They were able to overcome the disadvantage
as did all the other future movements.
According
to the conflict theory the oppression to a group by reducing the resources will
lead to a revolution. This can be seen as each of these countries was depraved
from freedom of speech and unfair treatment. This can be seen in the origins
and the strengthening presses that helped the revolution to begin and to succeed.
Over all the opening that allowed the Arab community to see how unfair they
were treated was unmistakably the endurance that the dictators could not defeat
the movement’s success. According to Marx the movement happened because those
with recourse were not balanced with those that work.
The mobilization theory states that
the success of a movement is directly dependent on the ability to move the resources
that are people, smart people and other crucial components for a revolution. This
is seen as the success was the communication between those that had a good
concept of how to ensure the success of the moment and those needed to ensure. Even
when Egypt did not have enough support from those that were able to have the
needed knowledge were later helped by the original revolutionary movement.
The overall success proves that
even when the connection disconnects us from others in real life it aids the connection
to those who we would not expect help. As
the life’s were taken it is a reminder of how people are willing to sacrifice
their lives to ensure freedom over the oppressing hand of corruption. Even in the darkest moments there is light in
the theories of who and why this movements start and end because they state we
can all work for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment